Conspiracy theory for the day

But first:
Our hearts are with the people of London and may our peace and resolve only grow stronger in the face of those who wish to dismantle same.


Now,
If I wanted to gain support for war that was unpopular, in a place that was increasingly against the war, how would I do it?

Here is what doesn't make sense:
As of this morning the death toll was roughly 50 people dead in yesterdays attacks (again our hearts go out to our British neighbors).
Three blasts in the London transportation system on a weekday morning, thankfully not but, I'm surprised that more people weren't hurt. These fatality numbers could have been much worse. I've been on the Underground, having less than fifty people around is the exception not the norm. Blowing up one tube train could kill hundreds. To have three blasts in this city of millions and only have 50 dead maybe takes more planning than we think.

Increasing pressure is being exhibited on Tony Blair from his constituents on Britain's involvement in the war on Terrorism.
Support for Bushs' war is waning in England and without England the U.S. losses all credibilty on this crusade.
(Also, Tony Blair was addressing global warming at the G8 conference that is going on in Scotland. Another sore subject for Bush and what better way to excuse him from the meetings?)
What better way to gain constituent support than "an attack" in Londons' metro system? And, what better time to do it than during the G8 conference. (And that will teach hime to talk about Global warming)

Who is "the secret society of Al Queda in Europe"? Haven't they always been known as just Al Queda?

Now I don't like thinking that my government would kill for a cause, but than I know better.